The ex-husband`s case was due to the fact that he and his wife had made changes to the rules of residence for minor children, which came into effect from About March 2008 to June 2009, and that, as such, his obligation to enrol in the court order of August 27, 2002 had been amended by agreement between him and the wife. He also submitted that, in view of the change in the residence regime adopted in March 2008, the parties had agreed to have the minor children with them for alternating weeks. In addition, there was another mediation agreement for a new payment scheme, insofar as it relates to the payment of support, in which the applicant would not have to pay support directly to the wife, but would cover all the costs of caring for minor children and make those payments directly to third parties. , in appropriate cases, to service providers and children. In this context, it turned out that the parties were supported by a Charles Cohen, a mediator with expertise in the field of family law. That`s why it`s important to get professional advice from an experienced divorce lawyer. CONSIDERING that the two parties have agreed to move forward separately, they wish to express their agreement on their rights and obligations with regard to the final settlement of all matters arising from the dissolution of the marriage, including the division of property rights, debt, visitation of children, custody and custody of the children. If it is a matter of having a full and complete divorce contract, it is best that you acquire the services of an experienced lawyer who can prepare the settlement contract and answer any questions you may have regarding the divorce proceedings. When the spouses are married to each other in the community of ownership, the common estate is split at the time of the divorce, as it exists at the time of the divorce, including all assets and liabilities. Married parties in a community of ownership will receive an indivisible share from all the assets constituting the common estate and will, in most cases, be jointly responsible for all debts incurred. Therefore, if the spouses were married in the community of ownership and enter into an agreement on this matter, of which one party lends a sum of money to the other, the right to claim such an amount is an asset of the common estate and the responsibility for the payment of the amount is a responsibility of the common estate. It follows that such a right to divorce cannot be asserted, since the parties are married in a community of ownership.
However, a lawyer is just as good as the information he or she receives from his or her clients, so you need to make sure that your divorce lawyer has the best and most comprehensive information available to ensure that you get the best advice for your specific situation. The court also found that if the Shifren principle was in fact entrenched and did not apply within the framework of family law, it could quite end up with all possible unintended consequences that could completely conflict with the development of a public policy consistent with the norms and values of our Constitution. In particular, strict adherence to these principles can lead parents to assume a disproportionate share of their responsibilities in the conservation and education of a minor child.